Thursday, February 26, 2009

Scary.

Every day, I try to keep in perspective what it is I really want out of a wedding, and what I would like to save for the rest of my life. And each day, I find myself getting sucked into this trap, where wedding vendors make me think that $2000 is totally a normal amount to spend on invitations; after all, they are beautiful letterpress, with soft, natural fiber paper, and innovative designs. And then, hopefully, I snap back into reality, where I realize that most people don't even really look at the invitations (at least not much), and that one can get something decent for a reasonable price.

I think this is particularly bad for me (and probably for Jill) given that we are doing most of our shopping on the North Shore of Chicago. I always knew it would be more expensive to get married in Chicagoland than say, Lafayette, IN. I just didn't know how bad it could be.

According to this website, the average American couple spends $15,299 and $25,498 on their wedding (this is probably excluding people who get married at a courthouse and don't have a "reception"). Here are some more statistics:

In West Lafayette [47906], the average cost of a wedding is: $19,429 and $32,382
Anderson, IN [46011]: $13,310 and $22,183
Indianapolis, IN [46201]: $16,369 and $27,282
Chicago, IL [60611]: $16,981 and $28,302

OK... about what you'd expect (actually, W. Laf. is full of some big spenders!). So imagine my surprise to see that the cost of a wedding in Wilmette, IL is: $72,362 and $120,603

HOLY SHIT!

Again, yes I expected it to be higher than pretty much all of Indiana... but more than 5x as expensive???

For some perspective, the cost of a wedding in Beverly Hills [90210] is: $57,216 and $95,361.

I'm not sure if I should feel good about myself for going *way* below average, or kick myself for agreeing to get married in such a frivolous part of the country!

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

We have flowers!

Today I booked the florist! We are using Ixia flowers in Evanston; the owner, Barbara Bellamy, was really nice, seems to do good work, and had what I consider reasonable prices (of course, wedding prices are always fairly ridiculous, but they were lower than a lot of their competitors).

I really liked her ideas for our arrangements, and also appreciated her giving me direct price quotes based on the flower choices (so that I can know various prices for bridesmaid bouquets, centerpieces, etc.). It will come in handy as we make tough decisons regarding what to keep and what to cut from our wedding (for budgetary reasons). Weddings are always a delicate dance between preference and practicality; it helps to be fully informed about what you're getting yourself into, though!

One of my major wedding pet peeves is that vendors are often *so* reluctant to give price estimates, but if you don't have a general feel for how much things cost, it is really hard to figure out how you are going to work out your budget!!! I understand that it can be impossible to give an exact quote on... say... centerpieces, when you don't know what a person wants, but you could give a range. how hard would it be to have this dialogue:

"Hi! I really like your work! What are your rates for centerpieces?"
"Centerpieces start at around $35, but our average centerpiece costs $70"
"What would a $35 centerpiece typically include? What would a typical flower arrangement consist of?"
"A $35 centerpiece might be small vase of daisies at each table. A typical centerpiece would consist of a fairly tight bunch of roses, lilies, gerber daisies, etc. in an 8" round bowl. If you want to get very creative or large, the price goes up."
I really can't see how that would be a turn-off to a bride; knowing up front what you are getting into is important, and I would imagine (especially in this economy) that going in for a full consultation with a too-expensive florist would just waste everyone's time!!!

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Marriages

Speaking of marriages, Proposition 8 is being judged by the supreme court on 3/5/2009. 18,000 gay couples stand to lose their marital status, despite having been married legally. I just think about the way I would feel if Dan and I were told that we could not get married (or stay married), and how hurtful and disheartening it would feel.

I believe that Prop 8 was a hateful piece of legislation that served no real point (don't like gay marriage? don't marry a gay!). I mean, let's face it, people... the people that developed Prop 8 are overwhelmingly religious. This is a nation that explicitly separates church and state in the constitution. US laws should not be based on religion, but on what is best for US citizens. Furthermore, there is no law forcing any church to recognize these marriages; if your conservative church disagrees with gay marriage, they are under no obligation to perform them! God not recognizing the marriage should be enough for these people, am I right?

Anyway, here is a really touching video, and a link to a petition (which you all should sign!)


"Fidelity": Don't Divorce... from Courage Campaign on Vimeo.

Wedding planning part II


To continue with the wedding theme, Dan and I went to the Day of Discovery at St. Thomas Aquinas, the Purdue Catholic center. I have to say that as Catholic Churches go, I love St. Tom's. They are so laid back, and genuinely nice (and, most likely due to the fact that they are a part of a huge university, they are fairly liberal, and incredibly smart [these are both very important to me!]).

Anyway, the Day of Discovery is where engaged couples go to learn about married life (from other married couples). There were numerous topics that were discussed:

Family of origin, or the fact that everyone comes from a different background, and has a very different view of what is "normal." The couple that discussed this topic were great; the woman came from a huge Italian family that took many family vacations and gathered en masse for Christmas... the man was the product of a cheerleader and a professional hockey player, who divorced each other early on, and only took "vacations" to rekindle romances (leaving the children with their uncle and a six pack of beer). Needless to say, they had different opinions on taking family vacations!

The next presentation was about children; the presenters were very quiet, so it was difficult to hear, but they had some good information about making lifestyle changes to make life easier on you and your children.

After that, Joe and Kristen Abbey (Joe works with Dan at Arxan), discussed natural family planning, (known to some as the rhythm method, although it is more complicated than that). Not exactly sure if I'm ready to give my womb over to God (He still has the birth control margin of error!!!) but it was interesting, and useful to some, nonetheless! Joe and Kristen did a good job discussing a fairly awkward topic, so kudos to them (and congrats about their baby on the way)!

The next speakers discussed finances, which is especially necessary during these troubling times. Dan and I knew most of the info they discussed, but given that money is such a common cause of marital stress, it is certainly a good topic!

After finances, the same couple discussed inter-faith marriage, and how important it is to have your own beliefs (rather than to force them upon each other). They mentioned how it is important to make decisions regarding child rearing, and that respecting differences in faith is a sign of love.

This was followed up with a discussion of spirituality, which I thought was somewhat weak; the presenters did a lot of 'we recommend X book, Y prayer, etc.' rather than discussing their personal issues with spirituality. That said, it was a hard topic, and when presenting to a large (ish) group, it is probably difficult to walk the line between "not spiritual enough" and "alienating jesus freak."

After that, there was a discussion on communication, by a soon-to-be retired communications professor, and his wife of over 50 years. They were fantastic. There was a lot of good advice; don't make assumptions regarding what your spouse would think on an issue; don't go to bed angry; make time for each other (these two still go on little coffee dates several times a week!), have fun, etc. They told a story about how in the 1960s/70s, it seemed like every professor was having an affair with his secretary. This professor's secretary was basically a part of their family; they were good friends. Well, after several divorces in the neighborhood (due to some administrative "assisting"), people were on high alert, and when someone saw this professor step out of his car with his young secretary (to get lunch), word got around (eventually to the professor's wife). If there hadn't been communication in their relationship, both of them agreed that this type of accusation could have been terrible for them! Anyway, they were very cute! (The woman apparently goes parasailing! Go granny!)

After that, the subject of challenges came up, and our hosts discussed their struggles with a debilitating neurological condition (the wife was diagnosed at age 25! scary!), and how it is important to listen to each other, and allow your spouse to feel angry, or upset, at times.

After that, Fr. George came in and gave us a talking-to, before we went to the 5:30 mass for our special blessing. It was a very long day, and sitting in chairs for the whole time was tiresome, but we got through it, and we are now one step closer to getting married! Yay!

Wedding planning part I

Oh, lots and lots to write about regarding Dan and my impending nuptials! I guess we should start at the beginning!

Around Valentine's day, Dan and I went to Chicago to get some things sorted out; we wanted to interview florists and DJs, sort out the invitations, get my dress fitted, find wedding shoes, choose our cake, and photograph the wedding sites (so that we can plan things like the flowers).

First stop was Ixia Flowers in Evanston. While they could not make any appointments to discuss our wedding when we were there (duh, Valentine's day! bad oversight on my part!), Barbara Bellamy did provide us with photographs of thier work, and some very basic price ranges (nothing too illuminating, as they can't give a quote when they don't know what I want!). They had some *gorgeous* potted orchids; some of the most interesting I have ever seen. Their style is fairly modern, and they seem to have a good eye for line and color.

After that, we went to the Crest of Fine Flowers in Wilmette, where they actually *did* sit down and chat us up for awhile. The man that talked with us was very friendly, and I liked their policy of not adding *any* additional stress (ie. if we need an extra arrangement at the last minute, they will do it). Their flowers were beautiful, and they have obviously done some extremely ornate pieces; however prices were a little high (for our budget; it might be low for some people on the North Shore, lol), however, so I am not sure if we will be able to afford them.

I then went shoe shopping, and had absolutely no luck (although a woman made me consider for half a second that Christian Louboutins would be a fabulous addition to my outfit, and well worth the $700. Thankfully it was only half a second :)

The next day I tried on my dress, which is unfortunately still a tad snug. Hopefully they can let it out in the appropriate places. Even more hopefully, I will not gain any weight (probably should have passed on the free cookie today!).

Speaking of weight gain, we did pick out our cake. It will be fabulous, I think! We are buying it from Three Tarts in Northfield; it will be a combination of vanilla and banana cake, with chocolate ganache and banana filling, and white buttercream icing. Yum! For those of you who aren't cake fans, there will also be another dessert at the wedding.

After the cake tasting (which, btw, is a good enough reason to get married!), we picked out our invitations, which my mother ordered on Friday (yay!). So we can also check that off of our list! We also took photos of Sunset Ridge and St. Francis before riding off into the sunset! I will post some of these pictures as soon as I get the chance!

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Gifts of the Water Magi

After work yesterday, Dan and I both went to the grocery store, independently, without each others' knowledge. It wasn't a secret, or anything, we just both remembered we needed some things, and didn't want to bother the other one with a shopping trip.

What is funny is we each bought giant bags of rice, two containers of hummus (same flavor), and pita bread, so now we have more rice and hummus than we could possibly need :-)

I also bought a box of bottled water; I was thinking of buying sparkling water (which is basically my obsession), but decided I didn't want to carry both of them out to the car, so resigned myself to drinking regular water, because Dan will also drink it (and it makes more sense to have something we will both drink).

When I got home, I saw three boxes of La Croix in the kitchen; Dan bought them for me, but did not buy himself any water.

The whole thing made me smile; it is really the little things that make you happy :-)

Thursday, February 12, 2009

1809


Two hundred years ago today, two of my favorite historical figures were born. Abraham Lincoln was born in a tiny, one room log cabin in Kentucky to two farmers. Charles Darwin was born to wealthy parents (his family owned the Wedgewood China company) in Shrewsbury, Shropshire, England.

Each of these men changed history massively; Lincoln held this country together during one of its most tumultuous times; he promoted equality, inspired troops, and became a symbol for all of us that a person from such humble roots can still succeed at the highest level (for more info on Lincoln, you can read my sister, Katie Hargrave's article here). As stated in Gettysburg on November 19, 1863:



Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation, so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate—we can not consecrate—we can not hallow—this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.


Interestingly, Charles Darwin also believed in equality, and was an avid abolitionist (as a yong man, he learned taxidermy from a freed slave). Darwin's work from Origin of Species, though hotly debated, has held up remarkably well; natural selection is a key biological principle, and provides a beautiful model for how the world has changed to be at its current state. He stated that:

As many more individuals of each species are born than can possibly survive; and as, consequently, there is a frequently recurring struggle for existence, it follows that any being, if it vary however slightly in any manner profitable to itself, under the complex and sometimes varying conditions of life, will have a better chance of surviving, and thus be naturally selected. From the strong principle of inheritance, any selected variety will tend to propagate its new and modified form.
and
There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.

I think this statement is so beautiful; that forms are continually changing in nature, and that we are all a product of our parents and our changing environments. The NY Times has some great info on evolution and natural selection here.

What a lucky day 2/12/1809 was for nerds like me in 2009!

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Today I am going running with Dan's sister, Chrissy (from Lets. Get. Dangerous). It has been so nice out that I've gone running nearly every day for the past week. Sure, I'm no amazing runner; I am slow and can't go that far (I usually only go 5k, although I have gone about 13k before... but pain ensued), but getting outside for a bit, and moving around really makes me feel better. I think I am a nicer, more optimistic person when I am running, which is something all of my running friends told me for years and I never believed.

In fact, there were so many things about running that I didn't believe... that it made you feel better, that there was a thing called "runner's high," that it was possible to enjoy it...

Strangely, I ran cross country in high school, but was never good, and never pushed myself to do anything challenging. I would get cramps from eating at the wrong time, or pushing myself too hard at first, and instead of working through it, I just walked for awhile. I never got the "runner's high" (not even when I *did* keep running), and I *never* enjoyed it. I think I may have been less depressed, but I don't even know that for sure since it was summertime, and I'm never as depressed in the summer.

Anyway, I was pretty much the worst one on the team, and never really took any pride in it. Now, I love it, though, and encourage everyone else to get out and move, even if you have to do it slowly. If you start running, know that you will be miserable at first, and to take it slow; it will get better, and you will enjoy it after awhile.

Saturday, February 7, 2009

Graffiti art


So, not so shockingly, graffiti artist Shepard Fairey, of Obey Giant and Obama poster fame, was arrested in Boston (reason unknown, but suspected reason is vandalism [in the form of graffiti]).  I believe this is his 16th arrest.  The article said that there was much protesting occurring from anti-graffiti groups regarding his upcoming show... which prompted me to wonder:

Who joins an anti-graffiti group?

Honestly... whether you think graffiti is a brilliant form of self-expression and civil disobedience, or ugly and a pain in the butt to clean up, at what point do you care so much one way or another to join an anti-graffiti group, or make anti-graffiti websites?

I decided to find out, so I read the first anti-graffiti website to pop up on google.  Mostly I found it whiny and filled with misplaced priorities (if the kids that are doing the tagging are really in trouble, why not worry about the underlying causes of drugs, gangs, and poor educational systems in the regions?!?).  But as a [former] artist, I took most offense to the notion that art in the graffiti style, but legally presented on free walls or inside museums, should be protested, since it sets a "bad example" for children.

Honestly, troll the Louvre one day to see some "bad examples" that are most certainly considered art, and that these anti-graffiti activists will most certainly appreciate.  Prostitution, political corruption, drunkenness, slavery... all represented in the majority of "fine art" museums.  The real reason these people do not want the "graffiti-style" artwork hanging in their museums is that it is not of their taste.  And there is no accounting for taste.

Which is why I propose the following experiment for anyone who is bored and owns a paintbrush or spray can:

Paint traditional artwork illegally in alleys and under bridges (please refrain from ruining anyone's business in this troubled economy though!) and observe the public reaction.  Here are some samples of what to paint:

(top to bottom: Fragonard, Gainsborough, Monet, Kinkade*)

*The first three will not sue you for reproducing their paintings... however I make no guarantees about Thomas Kinkade.  That said, illegally painting his oh so cozy landscapes would fill me with such subversive joy.

Friday, February 6, 2009

Developmental Neurobiology: A primer.

Note: I am not a developmental neurobiologist!!! I am a behavioral neuroscientist, which is strikingly different, despite the similarly fancy sounding names.  That said, I do understand some basics of developmental neurobiology, which allowed me to understand Dr. McConnell's lecture today.  While I won't go into the details of her talk, I would like to explain the super basics of neurobiology so that you can know, and I can remember.

So, when we are developing in utero, we are just a bundle of cells.  These cells start out basically the same, but eventually divide and become different types of cells (neurons, skin cells, bone cells, etc.).  Interestingly enough, these initial cells are most similar to neurons from the get-go.  At some point during development, these cells divide into neurons, and bone/skin cells.  After this happens, the neurons undergo a similar differentiation process, eventually becoming the multitude of neurons that exist in the br
ain.  Meanwhile, the bundle of nerve cells that is developing  (called the neural tube) grows and folds until it is s
haped like the brain we know and love :-)



But how does this happen?  How do these cells know what to become, and where to go?

The answer is fairly simple (although there are complex things going on that I won't go into, partially because I don't know myself!): concentration gradients.

So I said the initial tissue was most similar to nerve tissue.  There are two initial factors on each side of the tube; one side has a factor called Bone Morphogenic Protein (BMP), and the other has a protein called Wnt (the name doesn't really have much meaning to a non-biologist!).  Each one is more highly concentrated on one side, but in the middle there is a mixture.  At each cell, there is a fight going on between these two proteins.  If they are more "Wnt" then they stay nerve tissue.  If they are more "B
MP" they differentiate and become bones and skin, etc.  This gradient continues to act; the nerve cells that are closer to BMP become the peripheral nervous system; the Wnt-iest cells become the brain and spinal cord.

Other concentration gradients form (most notably Sonic Hedgehog) and do basically the same thing; telling neurons what they will become.  

After all of the fighting, there is a time-dependent battle in neurogenesis.  Since some cells want to send their axons to the brain stem, and others want to communicate with the cerebral cortex, more nerve differentiation must occur (if you think of how many neurons there are in the body, this will make sense to you!). 

 Anyway, you start out with a cell called a "progenitor cell."  This cell is like a blank slate for neurons; it can become anything.  Early on, all of these
 cells either lay dormant, or become sub-cortical cells (axons go to brain stem).  As time goes on, these cells become other parts of the brain, but the last ones to develop are the cortex cells (cortical-cortical, meaning they transfer information from one part of the cortex to another).  All of these cells come from the same progenitor cells.
What is interesting is if you take a cell from the beginning process (when it should be turning into a sub-cortical cell) and implant it into the late process (cortical-cortical), the cell will become a cortical-cortical cell.  So the progenitor cell adapts to the environment that is telling it to become cortical-cortical, despite initially wanting to become sub-cortical.

If you take a cell from the end process (when it should be turning into a cortical-cortical cell) and put it in the beginning process, it will lay dormant until the cortical-cortical environment occurs, and it will become a cortical-cortical process.  So basically a progenitor cell loses its ability to adapt to different environments as time goes on.  Eventually progenitor cells become support cells for the brain (glia), or adult stem cells (which can still differentiate into several different types of brain tissue in a similar manner).  

Anyway, if this didn't put you to sleep, you might consider a job as a neuroscientist! :)

Today

Today I feel much better than yesterday.  I woke up earlier (8am, still have work to do to get to work before 9), and had a good stretch, cup of tea, and shower.  I am thinking of adding stretching to my AM routine, since I think a lot of my lethargy comes from muscle soreness.  Anyway, I got a cookie from my office, and a cup of coffee from the lounge, and went in at 9:30 to go to Friday Reading, where we discussed innervation of the tongue.

Then I went to a lecture by Dr. Susan McConnell from Stanford, who discussed the development of the brain.  In my next blog entry, I will go over some of the basics of this, for anyone curious (if you don't care at all about developmental neurobiology, you can skip the entry!).  Anyway, Dr. McConnell was a wonderful speaker; I envy her abilities tremendously.  There is something wonderful about a person who not only gets excited about their work, but projects that excitement onto the entire room.  I think Stanford will be getting several postdoctoral applicants from the Purdue bio department.

Anyway, after the talk, I did my typical lab routine of weighing food, inflating balloons, nicking tails, and catheterizing jugulars, but I took a break to go for a run, and enjoy the weather outside.  It was a perfect day; sunny and warm (40-something degrees), almost my optimal running temp (around 55 degrees), and the run would have been perfect if it had not been for a slight stomach ache I was having (my tummy still feels a little funny, but I'm sure it will go away!).  After the run, I came back to the lab and did my last surgery (I watched Grey's Anatomy and Private Practice today; I am all out of medical shows!!! What will I do!?!?!)

Anyway, it was altogether a good day.  I think I like being busy, but only so busy.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Busy, Busy, Busy...


Today was a long day in a string of long days, and I'm tired, and possibly vitamin-deficient (I took some just recently; I'm hoping it will make me feel better!).  

My day progressed as follows:   Woke up, got coffee from  Greyhouse, and went into the lab a little later than intended, after going to bed super late last night (reading about the "trace" in "trace conditioning."  Super.), then inflated the gastric balloons in my rats, then weighed rat chow, then helped remove food/water from Annette's drunken rats, then ate lunch ((BREATHE!))...

...then began removing alcohol bottles from Annette's drunken rats, this was interrupted when I was bitten by a rat (through the cage!).  After that, I helped obtain blood from RJ's rats via tail nick, then did a surgery, then tried to do another surgery but the rat failed to cooperate [he was anesthesia-resistant!!!], then gathered more blood from RJ's rats, labeled eppendorf tubes, did two more surgeries, read two papers, and went home.  I still have several other papers to read, but I really don't wanna!!!!

I also have three more jugular catheters to put in, I need to write a statement of career goals so that I can continue to have funding, and make intra-gastric balloons for my rats.  Then I will have still more papers to read for Kim/TD's classes, and the sacrifice of this group of LOON rats, as well as another set of papers to read.... I am the worst reader of all time.

I keep trying to get ahead in school and work, but as soon as I'm caught up on one thing, something else creeps up.  It is frustrating!

10 year old suicide


The Chicago Tribune is reporting a story of a 10 year old Evanston boy who was found hanging from a hook in the school bathroom. The coroner has ruled it a suicide.

Assuming it was a suicide (many are skeptical, thinking it was a bully who hung him up there for laughs), this is one of the most bizarrely depressing stories I have read, and it has left me wondering...

Psychologically, what compels a 10 year old to take his own life? I suppose the question is what compels anyone to. Depression, chronic pain, hallucinations? Was the boy even aware of what he was doing, or was he imitating something he saw on TV? Given that the boy was reportedly happy, what changed?

There are approximately 3 dozen child suicides per year in this country. What were all of these kids thinking? What differentiates child suicide from accidental death?

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Rat Surgeries

I am just about to start my last rat surgery for the day. Today, it is jugular catheters. This means I insert a small piece of tubing into the rat's jugular vein so that we can draw blood without hurting the rat or disrupting his feeding cycle. I have finished 3 today, and have 7 more to do (including the 4th of the day) this week.

Normally these surgeries are fun for me, but today I am just not feeling it. Hopefully this won't affect the outcomes. FYI, here is a bad picture of the area I'm catheterizing... the greenish part is the jugular vein.

Chicago fire

This is a picture of the beautiful Holy Name Cathedral in Chicago, as firefighters attempt to save it from a fire this morning. According to reports, no-one was injured, but they still have not identified the cause of the blaze.

As an art/architecture buff, I always get particularly sad when this type of tragedy happens. Much of the contents of these buildings are works of art, or historical relics (and in the case of Catholic churches, often anthropological relics as well). When a modern building burns down, the first thing I think of is whether or not everyone is OK. When a beautiful old building catches fire, my thoughts are more muddled between concern for life and concern for the aesthetics. I probably have my priorities out of whack, but for your perusal:

This is the interior of Holy Name:



And the organ:



And the Galeros, which are the ceremonial hats of each of the Cardinals that have died while serving there:



I remember when Cardinal Bernardin passed away, and they hung his Galero on the ceiling. From what the Tribune says, there is some water damage, so I hope they are OK.

Holy Name recently reopened after a long stretch of renovations, so it is particularly sad for their Parishoners.

I am always sad to see anything in Chicago burn down. Until I hear otherwise, I will blame it on Mrs. O'Leary's cow.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Catholic Wedding Planning

Since Dan and I are getting married at St. Francis Xavier in Wilmette, IL, we will need to abide by all of the protocols instilled by the Church. For my own reference, and to help anyone else in planning their Catholic wedding, I will be chronicling the process.

Dan and I fall into a special (although not particularly rare) group, according to the Catholic Church, because:
  • we live together
  • Dan is not Catholic
That said, we are also not in the even more special group of people who:
  • have been married before
  • have one non-Christian (or non-baptized) partner
(these people will have to turn elsewhere for info on the marriage process).

Anyway, since SFX is in Chicagoland, and Dan and I are in West Lafayette, we are completing all of the coursework here, at St. Thomas Aquinas (the Catholic center at Purdue). I spoke to the lady in charge of everything, Eileen Strater, on the phone today. She was really helpful in explaining what we will need to have accomplished prior to our wedding. Here is an overview:
  • Meet and fill out a questionnaire. There will be 150+ questions (more for us, b/c of our "special" status)
  • Go to a pre-cana retreat (ours will be Saturday, 2/21, pretty much all day)
  • Attend several other meetings (she said about 3, around 1h each) to discuss our answers to the questionnaire, and discuss different topics such as conflict resolution, commitment, etc.
  • Fill out paperwork. This includes obtaining a "freedom to marry" affidavit, which our parents are to fill out, to prove that we haven't been married before, and that there is nothing that is in the way of us getting married before the Church. We also need to obtain baptismal certificates (Dan's can be any sort of proof of baptism; mine has to be an official Catholic document from the place I was baptized). These need to be obtained within the 6 months prior to the wedding (so between April 10, and October 10, 2009).
That seems to be about it; I will blog about the retreat and meetings. I think it is interesting to know how people prepare for marriage.

There is no Snuffy... Only Zuul.

Sadly, Snuffy came and went this AM, and we have very little to show for it. The previous homeowners jury-rigged the system such that only the hot water was connected to the softener. WTF is the point in that? Anyway, it will take 4 hours to set it up so that *all* of our water is softened, and Snuffy did not have 4 hours to spare today. He will come again in a week though; I suppose my hair can wait.

Waiting for Snuffy

This is an exciting morning in home-improvement land, my friends! Today we finally get our water softener replaced by Snuffy the Plumber! I love his name.

I guess not everyone finds softened water as exciting as I do, but it means a few lovely things:
  1. Better hair.
  2. Better skin.
  3. Less soapscum sticking to the side of the bathtub (I hope, anyway!).
So here's hoping Snuffy has no problems with the snow outside, and can get here soon! :)

Monday, February 2, 2009

Dance Marathon

My brother, Charlie, is pulling all of the philanthropic weight of the family lately. In October, my brother ran the Chicago Marathon for an organization called Dance Marathon, which benefits the oncology department of the University of Iowa Children's Hospital.

Now he is *dancing* the Dance Marathon in Iowa; he will be dancing (or at least standing) for 24 (continuous) hours this weekend.

Charlie is trying to raise $1000 in 4 days for this cause; he has made a good start but still has a ways to go. If you feel the need to donate, you can go here.

Thanks, everyone!!! :)

That's *doctor* evil, to you...


The LA Times has an article about Jill Biden, who holds a doctorate in education, wanting to be addressed as Dr., rather than Mrs., Biden (the article also mentions that she is really the first "second lady" to hold a job in the regular work force, which I think is pretty cool).

Anyway, the article seems to imply that the title "doctor" is to be reserved for those practicing medicine. I find this short sided. The Ph.D. preceded the M.D. historically, and the education levels are comparable. The reason that "doctor" seems to refer to those in the medical profession seems to stem from the fact that the general public encounters medical doctors far more often than they do doctors of philosophy (until they go to college, that is, and the fact remains that many of us do not attend universities).

In any case, if one wishes to respect medical doctors more than doctors of philosophy, this is their perogative (after all, M.D.s save peoples lives in a much, much more direct sense than a Ph.D. [if the Ph.D. is in the business of saving lives at all]). However, both professions require an enormous amount of intellegence and training, and both set out to serve the public good. Jill Biden, like any other doctor, deserves the title associated with all of that training! Suggesting it impolite for her to suggest it is ridiculous!

Sunday, February 1, 2009

First post.

Hi, everybody! After much procrastination, I have decided it is time I start writing my thoughts down, so that I don't forget them in the future!

The main topics of this blog will most likely be: science, psychology, fitness, nutrition, grad school (in general), art, travel, and wedding planning (the last one will probably only be until October, when I will be married(!!!) and therefore not so focused on planning weddings). There will also probably be "feelings" discussed here, but I will try to keep them at least somewhat interesting, and pertinent to some sort of topic.

Anyway, I have had a reasonably productive weekend thus far! Yesterday, I made cupcakes with roses on them; there is about as much icing as cupcake on each one, which I'm sure Katie would love.

FYI, if anybody wants to learn how to make roses, it is a lot easier than it looks. Look up "buttercream rose" on youtube, and copy people!!!

Today, I learned Dan's special techniques for making pancakes, and then went for a run. I was wearing my Hind running tights and top (both of which I got for Christmas - thanks Mom!), which are both black, and a ski mask that I found in the closet; I looked somewhere between cat-burglar and ninja (save the pink sneakers!). The weather was really nice out; I didn't need the mask (normally the cold air hurts my lungs, and I am crying by mile no. 2, but this time I did 4 miles without a lot of trouble, and was actually quite hot by the end of it). Here is a ninja-pic for you all to enjoy:

Anyway, now I am going to go to to visit Chrissy and Chris for El Tazón Magnífico (and then to Brad's for the other half of the game). Honestly, I don't think I can muster up enough enthusiasm for either team, or the event itself; I am more interested to see which companies still have money to afford commercials... :)

Anyway, I hope everyone enjoys their weekends! Thanks for reading!

<3 Sara